Hours later in Chicago, during a speech on his economic agenda, Biden kept at it, calling out Tuberville by name.
Biden spoke of the lawmakers who “strenuously opposed” the bill and suggested that his $42 billion to expand high-speed internet access, announced earlier this week, is “bringing along some converts” from within the Republican Party.
“There’s a guy named Tuberville … senator from Alabama, when I say strongly oppose the legislation. Now, he’s hailing this passage,” Biden told the crowd.
The Biden administration’s ambitious plan aims to deliver reliable broadband to the entire country by 2030. Alabama is among the top 10 states receiving the most funding through the plan — $1.4 billion.
In 2021, Tuberville argued that he could not vote for the infrastructure legislation because it failed “to give Alabama a fair slice of the pie while also saddling Alabama taxpayers with even more debt.”
Republicans, like Tuberville, now argue that since Biden signed the bill into law, their constituents deserve to get their slice of federal dollars.
Steven Stafford, a spokesperson for Tuberville, said the senator has never “hailed” the infrastructure bill’s passage — as Biden suggested in his speech.
“Coach voted against the infrastructure bill because it wasted Alabamians’ tax dollars. … But now that it is law of the land, the people of Alabama deserve their fair share. Coach is proud to advocate for this funding to go to Alabama,” Stafford said of the former college football coach.
In the days after Biden’s announcement, several other Republicans have praised the funds for their states — and been called out by the White House for their embrace of money they opposed.
A White House memo shared with reporters mentioned Republicans having “a timely conversion” to supporting provisions of the infrastructure law, specifically citing Reps. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Communications and Technology Subcommittee Chair Robert E. Latta (R-Ohio).
The pair of Republican lawmakers in a statement called the broadband plan “an important step in our work to close the digital divide.” Their statement also emphasized the need for oversight of the funds.
Sean Kelly, a spokesperson for McMorris Rodgers, emphasized that the committee “will continue its oversight work to make sure these allocations are not wasted and go to the communities that need them most. Every cent of taxpayer dollars should be spent wisely and effectively to close the digital divide, and that is a priority everyone should agree on.”
Latta’s office similarly told The Post that the congressman has long been focused on closing the digital divide and oversight, saying, “Now that the bill is law and funds are being allocated, the taxpayers he represents deserve to know how the allocation in broadband funding will impact their communities[.]”
Another Republican named in the White House memo, Rep. Gus Bilirakis (Fla.), had argued that “the vast majority of spending contained within the [bipartisan infrastructure bill] centers around pushing unpopular, liberal policy proposals” and would “hurt both American consumers and workers.” On Tuesday, however, he tweeted that he worked closely with local and state officials to help them attain the broadband funds.
Summer Blevins, Bilirakis’s deputy chief of staff, said that although the congressman voted against the final infrastructure bill, “he does recognize that his constituents can benefit from the [broadband expansion] program. His team has worked closely with local and state government stakeholders to ensure they are well-positioned to receive their fair share of federal funding that has been allocated for this purpose.”
Republicans’ public discussion of Biden-backed broadband funds going to their states has led to backlash online.
When online commenters criticized Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) for sharing a story about the $3.3 billion in broadband funds his state is receiving as a result of the infrastructure law funds, he pushed back.
“You bet I did (vote against it) … because it was not paid for and thus grew the debt and … fueled inflation that is robbing Texans and other Americans of their standard of living,” Cornyn tweeted. “Broadband is important, but you don’t solve one problem by creating two more. There is a better way.”
You bet I did 1) because it was not paid for and thus grew the debt and 2) fueled inflation that is robbing Texans and other Americans of their standard of living. Broadband is important, but you don’t solve one problem by creating two more. There is a better way. https://t.co/bzWARp5Cma
— Senator John Cornyn (@JohnCornyn) June 28, 2023
Mitch Landrieu, the White House infrastructure implementation coordinator, told The Post that it’s “unfortunate that congressional Republicans like Senator Tuberville voted no but still want the dough. If they had integrity, they’d applaud President Biden’s leadership for putting us on the path to bringing reliable, affordable high-speed internet to every American.”
The responses to Republican statements about broadband expansion are part of broader efforts by the White House to illustrate a contrast between Democratic policy efforts and Republicans’ opposition.
Biden, who is seeking reelection in 2024, sometimes zeroes in on GOP members who opposed his legislation but showed enthusiasm when funding from those priorities came their way.
At a fundraiser in California this month, the president similarly called out Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), telling donors he’s planning to show up in her district to highlight a project funded through his plan. In April, she celebrated the expansion of a solar panel production company in her district — a project made possible through tax incentives in a piece of legislation she opposed: Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act.
Vice President Harris visited the plant in Greene’s district this spring.
This week, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) criticized Biden’s green energy initiative but picked an odd location — an electric battery supplier that is the recipient of federal funds.
